Skip to content

פסחים 102

Read in parallel →

1 Which Tanna [rules thus on precipitate] rising? R. Judah. For it was taught: If companions were reclining, and they [precipitately] arose to go to the synagogue or to the Beth Hamidrash, when they go out they do not need a blessing beforehand, and when they return they do not need a blessing at the beginning. Said R. Judah: When is that said? When they left some of their companions behind. But if they did not leave some of their companions behind, when they go out they need a blessing beforehand, and when they return they need a blessing at the beginning. Then [make an opposite deduction]: it is only because they are things which need a blessing in the same place that when they go out they do not need a blessing beforehand and when they return they do not need a blessing at the beginning. But for things which do not need a blessing in the same place, even on the view of the Rabbis, when they go out they need a blessing beforehand and when they return they need a blessing at the beginning: shall we say that this is a refutation of R. Johanan[‘s ruling]? — But have we not [already] refuted him once? Shall we [then] say that from this too there is a refutation?-[No:] R. Johanan can answer you: The same law holds good that even for things which do not require a blessing after them in the same place it is unnecessary to recite a blessing [afresh], but as to why he teaches, ‘They [precipitately] arose,’ that is to inform you the extent of R. Judah[‘s view], [viz.,] that even for things which require a blessing after them in the same place, it is only because they left some companions behind [that these additional blessings are not recited]; but if they did not leave some companions behind, when they go out they need a blessing beforehand, and when they return they need a blessing at the beginning. It was taught in accordance with R. Hisda: If companions were reclining to drink wine and they arose [departed] and returned, they need not recite a blessing [anew]. Our Rabbis taught: If members of a company were reclining when the day became holy upon them, a cup of wine is brought to one of them and he recites over it the sanctity of the day [i.e., kiddush], and a second [cup is brought] over which he recites the Grace after meals: these are the words of R. Judah. R. Jose said: he goes on eating until nightfall.6

2 When they finish [their meal], he recites the Grace after meals over the first cup and the sanctity of the day over the second. Yet why so: let us recite both over one cup? — Said R. Huna in R. Shesheth's name: One may not recite two sanctities over the same cup. What is the reason? Said R. Nahman b. Isaac: Because you may not perform religious duties in wholesale fashion. Yet [may you] not? Surely it was taught: He who enters his house at the termination of the Sabbath, recites blessings over the wine, the light and the spices, and then recites habdalah over the cup [of wine]. But if he has one cup only, he leaves it until after the meal and he recites them all together after it? — Where he has not [enough,] it is different. But on the Festival which falls after the Sabbath, though he has [wine] , yet Rab said: [The order is] Yaknah. — I will tell you: Since he [Rab] did not include ‘the season’ [zeman], it follows that we are discussing the seventh day of Passover, by which time he has consumed all that he had and has one more. But on the first day of the Festival he has [wine], yet Abaye said: [The order is] Yakzanah; while Raba said: [The order is] Yaknehaz? — But habdalah and kiddush constitute one observance], [whereas] the Grace after meals and kiddush are two [distinct observances]. [To turn to] the [main] text: When a Festival falls after the Sabbath, Rab said: [The order is] Yaknah; Samuel said: [The order is] Yanhak;15ʰʲˡʳˢ