Sanhedrin

'R. Judah said: The same applies if she said [to her rescuer] "Let him be", lest he slay her.' In which case do they  differ? — Raba said: when she objects to dishonour, yet permits him, so that he should not slay her. The Rabbis maintain, The Divine Law was insistent for her honour, and since she too is particular about it. [her pursuer may be slain]. But R. Judah maintains that the reason that the Divine Law decreed that he should be slain is because she is prepared to give her own life [rather than be violated]; but this one is not prepared to do so. R. Papa said to Abaye: But does not a High Priest dishonour a widow?  — He replied, The Divine Law sought to protect her from great dishonour, but not from little dishonour. 'Sin — refers to women forbidden on pain of extinction. The Scholars objected: [We learnt,] Fine is imposed for the violation of the following maidens:  he who outrages his sister.  — The Rabbis explained this before R. Hisda: Once he has committed the first stage, thereby dishonouring her, he may no longer be slain;  whereas monetary liability is not contracted until the completion of cohabitation.  Now, this agrees with the view that the first stage [which dishonours her] is contact with her sexual organ; but on the view that the first stage is the insertion of the membrum, what can you say?  But R. Hisda answered thus: This refers to unnatural followed by natural cohabitation.  Raba said: This applies where she allows him [to have his will] so that he shall not slay her, and is based on the ruling of R. Judah.