Soncino English Talmud
Bava Batra
Daf 164b
Surely. the date of the one [deed] is not like that of the other; [for in the case of] a Plain [deed], the first completed year of a king's reign is counted as his first, [and] the second completed year as his second; [while in the case of] a folded [one], the first year of a king's reign is counted as his second, the second as his third; and sometimes [it may happen] that [a person] might borrow money from another on a folded [deed] and, in the meantime, he might obtain funds and repay him, but [when] requesting the return of his deed, [the creditor] might reply to him, 'I lost it', and would write out for him [instead], a receipt; and when the time of its payment arrived, he might convert it [into] a plain [deed] and say to him, 'You borrowed from me now'! — He holds the view that a receipt is not written. Was Rabbi, however, familiar with [the dating of] a folded [deed]? Surely, once a certain folded [deed] was brought before Rabbi who remarked, 'This is post-dated', and Zonin said to him, 'Such is the practice of this nation: [If a king] reigned a [full] year they count it as his second year; [if] two [years], they count them as his third [year]'! — After he heard it from Zonin he knew it. In a certain [plain] deed there occurred the [following] date: 'In the year of the archon X'. Said R. Hanina: Let enquiry be made when [that] archon assumed office. Might he [not on that date] have been in office for some years? — R. Hoshaia replied, 'Such is the practice of this nation: [In the] first year they call him, "archon", [in the] second they call him, digon.' Is it not possible that he was deposed and re-appointed? — R. Jeremiah replied: [In] such [a case] he is designated, 'archon-digon'. Our Rabbis taught: [In the case where a person said.] 'I am to be a nazarite', Symmachus said, [if he added], hena [he must observe] one [term]; [if he added], digon [he must observe] two terms; trigon, three [terms]; tetragon, four [terms]; pentagon, five [terms]. Our Rabbis taught: A circular, two cornered, three cornered, and five cornered house is not subject to uncleanness from [house] plagues; a four-cornered house is subject to uncleanness from [such] plagues. Whence is this inferred? — for our Rabbis taught: Above it is said, [instead of] 'wall', walls, [signifying] two; below [also]. [instead of] 'wall', it is said, walls, [which similarly signifies] two, thus making a total of four [walls]. A folded [deed] was once brought before Rabbi who remarked, 'There is no date on this [deed]'. [Thereupon], R. Simeon son of Rabbi said to Rabbi, 'It might be hidden between its folds'. [On] ripping [the seams] open he saw it. Rabbi turned round [and] looked at him with displeasure. 'I did not write it', [said the other]. 'R. Judah Hayyata wrote it'. Keep away from talebearing', [Rabbi] called to him. Once he was sitting in his presence when he finished a section of the Book of Psalms. 'How correct is this writing'? said Rabbi. 'I did not write it', replied the other, 'Judah Hayyata wrote it'. 'Keep away from tale-bearing'. [Rabbi] called to him. In the first case one can well understand [Rabbi's exhortation, since] there was slander; what tale-bearing, however, was there here? — Owing to [the teaching] of R. Dimi; for R. Dimi, brother of R. Safra, taught: A man should never speak in praise of his friend, because by praise of him he brings about his blame. R. Amram said in the name of Rab: [There are] three transgressions which no man escapes for a single day: Sinful thought, calculation on [the results of] prayer, and slander. 'Slander'? [How] could one imagine [such a thing]!
Sefaria
Bava Batra 171b · Nazir 8b · Leviticus 14:34 · Leviticus 14:37 · Leviticus 14:39
Mesoret HaShas