Parallel
עירובין 37:1
Soncino English Talmud · Berean Standard Bible
he may say: ‘Two log which I am about to set aside are terumah, ten are first tithe and nine are second tithe’, and this he redeems and may drink [the wine] forthwith; so R. Meir, but R. Judah, R. Jose and R. Simeon forbid [this procedure]. ‘Ulla said: Ayo's version is not to be upheld by reason of what was stated in our Mishnah. What, however, about the statement, ‘R. Judah, R. Jose and R. Simeon forbid [this procedure]’? — Ulla read [the names of the authors] in pairs [thus:] ‘So R. Meir and R. Judah, but R. Jose and R. Simeon forbid [this procedure]’. But is R. Jose of the opinion that the rule of bererah is not to be upheld? Have we not in fact learnt: R. Jose ruled: If two women bought their bird sacrifices jointly, or gave the price of their bird sacrifices to the priest, the latter may offer whichever he wishes as a burnt-offering and whichever he wishes as a sin-offering? — Rabbah replied: There [it is a case] where [the women originally] made this condition. But if that is the case what [need was there] to state [such an obvious ruling]?- We were thereby informed [that the law is] in agreement with R. Hisda. For R. Hisda ruled: Bird sacrifices cannot be designated20
—