— They disagree as to a preventive measure in respect of sinking [the laver]. But surely R.Johanan said: If [the priest] sanctified his hands for the removal of the ashes, he need not sanctify [them again] on the morrow, because he has already sanctified [them] at the beginning of the service. According to Raba who explains that this agrees with R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon, it is well: this [the present ruling] agrees with Rabbi. But according to Abaye who explains that it agrees with Rabbi, Rabbi is self-contradictory, [for] why must he lower it there, whereas here he must not lower it? — It means that he raises it and then lowers it again. If so, ‘on the morrow he does not sanctify’ — why so? [The meaning is] that he need not sanctify, which is to say that [the previous sanctification] is indeed fit for the mattirin. Then it is the same as R. Hisda[‘s ruling]? — They disagree in respect of the regulation of lowering. An objection is raised: They neither saw him nor heard him until they heard the sound of the wood of the machine which Ben Kattin made for the laver, and then they exclaimed. ‘It is time to sanctify hands and feet at the laver’ . Surely it means that he raised it, and which proves that it was sunk [earlier]? — No: it means that he lowered it [now]. If he lowered it, would the sound be heard? — He lowered it by the wheel. Another version: He lowered it by means of its stone, in order that the sound of it should be heard, so that they [the priests] might hear it and come. But there was Gebini the crier? — They made two alarms; some heard the one and came, whilst others heard the other and came. The [above] text [stated]: ‘R. Jose son of R. Hanina said: You may not wash in a laver which does not contain sufficient [water] for the sanctification of four priests. for it says. That Moses and Aaron and his sons wash their hands and their feet thereat’. An objection is raised: All vessels sanctify. whether they contain a rebi'ith20ᵃᵇᶜᵈᵉᶠᵍʰⁱʲᵏˡᵐⁿᵒᵖᵠʳˢᵗ