יומא 29:2 — Soncino English Talmud

let him put it back and take it again when it is day? — He learnt and explained it: The vessels of ministration render what is in them sacred even outside of the proper time. An objection was raised: This is the rule: Whatsoever is offered up during the day, becomes sanctified by day and whatsoever is offered up during the night becomes sanctified both by day and by night. At any rate it is taught that whatsoever is offered up during the day becomes sanctified by day only, and not by night? — It may not become sanctified [enough] to be offered up, but it may become sanctified enough to be invalidated. R. Zera raised an objection: If he put in order the shewbread and the [frankincense] clip after the Sabbath and smokes the [contents of] the cups on the [following] Sabbath it is invalid. What should he do? He should leave it for the coming Sabbath, for even if it stayed for many days on the table, that does not matter. But why? It should be sanctified and invalidated? — Raba said: He who raised the objection, raised a valid one, and the father of R. Abin is also quoting a Baraitha, but it is of the opinion that the night is not considered a wanting time, the day however is so considered. But when the night of Sabbath approaches, let it then become at once sanctified and invalidated? — Rabina said: We assume that he removed it before then. Mar Zutra, or as some say, R. Ashi said: You may set the case even if he had not removed it before [Sabbath eve], since, however, he had put it in order at variance with the regulation it is as if a monkey had laid it there. THIS WAS THE RULE IN THE TEMPLE etc.: It is quite right that the feet must be washed because of squirtings, but why must the hands be washed? — R. Abba said: This teaches us that it is^ᵃ^ᵇ^ᶜ^ᵈ^ᵉ^ᶠ^ᵍ^ʰ^ⁱ^ʲ^ᵏ^ˡ^ᵐ

^ᵃnote:Hence it can no more be put back. Since the vessel has sanctified it for the altar, it must not be put back among the remaining part of the meal-offering.
^ᵇnote:E.g.,the meal-offerings, the incense.
^ᶜnote:The text here corrected in accord with Bah. V. Tem. 14a. [Cur. ed. inserts ‘and whatsoever is offered up during the night becomes sanctified by night, and whatsoever is offered up both during the day and during the night becomes sanctified both by day and by night.’ As the former can refer only to drink-offerings (V. Ta'an. 2b) which however are offered up also during the day, this passage is omitted and the text corrected accordingly.]
^ᵈnote:Which means that there is no sanctification but in the proper time.
^ᵉnote:[If it tarries overnight without having been offered (V. Zeb. 87a). The fistful accordingly having been placed in the vessel of ministration at night becomes invalidated with daybreak, and can no longer be put back among the remaining part of the meal-offering.]
^ᶠnote:[Because it had not been left on the table for seven days as prescribed, v. Lev. XXIV, 5ff. Var. lec. rightly omit: it is invalid, V. Rashi.]
^ᵍnote:Through having been set on the table in its proper time.
^ʰnote:It is not the case of all Amoraic opinion, which can be refuted by argument. It is an authoritative Tannaitic teaching and a way must be found to bring the present argument in accord with it.
^ⁱnote:The day goes after the night, hence it is part of the night, hence the fistful put into the vessel at night is regarded as having been put therein in the proper time and consequently is sanctified properly. Since, however, it is a day-offering it must be burned with the shewbread; however, where there is a whole day wanting, the bread does not become sanctified.
^ʲnote:Since the night is not considered as ‘wanting time’, whereas everything that is due during the day and was placed into the sacred vessels in the preceding night, becomes sanctified and invalidated, then, when the eve of second Sabbath comes, let the table sanctify the bread and invalidate it?
^ᵏnote:When it was wanting time.
^ˡnote:Without any intention, hence the table does not sanctify it, for we consider that since it was placed there without intention, it was technically not placed there at all, hence it becomes neither sanctified nor invalidated.
^ᵐnote:Of urine.