Skip to content

עירובין 78:1

Read in parallel →

If on a moulding of an area of four handbreadths by four handbreadths that projected from a wall a ladder of the smallest size was rested a valid reduction is thereby effected. This, however, applies only where the ladder was resting on it, but if it was placed at the side of its the latter is thereby merely extended. R. Nahman further stated in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: A wall that was nineteen handbreadths high requires only one projection to enable it to be used as a means of access, but a wall twenty handbreadths high requires for the purpose two projections. R. Hisda observed: This, however, applies only where they are not situated exactly one above the other. R. Huna ruled: If in a public domain there was a post ten handbreadths high and four handbreadths wide and a peg of the smallest size had been inserted on it, a valid reduction is thereby effected. R. Adda b. Ahabah observed: Provided the peg was three handbreadths high. Both Abaye and Raba, however, maintain: Even if it was not three handbreadths high. What is their reason? — Because it is no longer suitable for use. R. Ashi ruled: Even if it was three handbreadths high. What is the reason?- It is possible to suspend some object from it. R. Aha son of Raba asked R. Ashi, ‘What is the ruling where it was completely covered with pegs?’ — ‘Did you not hear’, the other replied: ‘the following ruling of R. Johanan: A pit and the bank around it combine to constitute a depth of ten handbreadths? Now seeing that [the bank] cannot be used why [should it be regarded as a private domain]? What then can you say in reply? That some object might be placed over it and thereby it is made available for use. Well then, here also some object might be placed [over them] and thereby it is made available for use’. Rab Judah citing Samuel ruled: A wall ten handbreadths high requires a ladder of fourteen handbreadths in length to render it permissible for use R. Joseph ruled: Even [a ladder] of thirteen handbreadths and a fraction [is sufficient]. Abaye ruled: Even one of eleven handbreadths and a fraction suffices. R. Huna son of R. Joshua ruled: Even one of seven handbreadths and a fraction suffices. Rab stated: That a ladder in a vertical position effects a reduction is a tradition but I do not know the reason for it. ‘Does not Abba’, Samuel said to him, ‘know the reason for this ruling? The case is in fact similar to that of a balcony above a balcony’. Rabbah citing R. Hiyya said: The palm-trees of Babylon need not be fixed to the ground. What is the reason? Their heaviness imparts permanency of position to them. R. Joseph, however, citing R. Oshaia, ruled: The ladders in Babylon need not be fixed in position. What is the reason? Their heaviness imparts permanency of position to them. He who spoke of ladders would a fortiori apply the same ruling to palm-trees. He, however, who spoke of palm-trees does not apply the same ruling to ladders. R. Joseph enquired of Rabbah: What is the ruling where two ladders were held together by straw links between them? The sole of the foot, the other replied, cannot ascend upon them. What is your ruling if the ladder was in the middle and the straw links were on each side? — Behold, the other replied, the sole of the foot does ascend upon them.58ʰʲˡʳˢʷˣʸᵃᵃᵃᵇᵃᶜᵃᵈᵃᵉᵃᶠᵃᵍᵃʰᵃⁱᵃʲᵃᵏᵃˡᵃᵐᵃⁿᵃᵒᵃᵖᵃᵠᵃʳᵃˢᵃᵗᵃᵘᵃᵛᵃʷᵃˣᵃʸᵃᶻᵇᵃᵇᵇᵇᶜᵇᵈᵇᵉᵇᶠ