Skip to content

עירובין 104:1

Read in parallel →

only a piece of material that was three handbreadths by three causes an interposition while one that is less than three handbreadths by three causes no interposition. This is in fact identical with the ruling which Raba cited in the name of R. Hisda. Must it be conceded that this differs from the view of R. Judah son of R. Hiyya? — A bandage is different since it is significant. But according to R. Johanan. instead of being informed about the reed-grass, why were we not informed about a bandage? — We were taught indirectly that reed-grass heals. MISHNAH. SALT MAY BE SCATTERED ON THE ALTAR'S ASCENT THAT THE PRIESTS SHALL NOT SLIP. WATER ALSO MAY BE DRAWN ON THE SABBATH BY MEANS OF A WHEEL FROM THE CISTERN OF THE EXILES AND FROM THE GREAT CISTERN; AND ON A FESTIVAL DAY FROM THE HAKER WELL ALSO. GEMARA. R.Ika of Pashronia pointed out to Raba the following inconsistency. We learned, SALT MAY BE SCATTERED ON THE ALTAR'S ASCENT THAT THE PRIESTS SHALL NOT SLIP. Thus only in the Temple is this permitted but not in the country. But is not this inconsistent with the following: If a courtyard floor was damaged by rainwater one may bring straw and level it? — Straw is different since its owner does not renounce it. Said R. Aha son of Raba to R. Ashi: How are we to understand the case of the SALT? if its owner has renounced it, would not the scattering constitute an addition to the structure? And if he did not renounce it, would it not constitute an unlawful interposition? — This is a case where the salt was scattered when the limbs of sacrifices were carried up the ascent, an act which is not regarded as part of the Temple service. But is it not indeed? Was it not in fact written in Scripture. And the priest shall offer the whole, and make it smoke upon the altar, a text which, a Master explained, refers to the carrying of the limbs up the ascent? — Rather say: This refers [to salt scattered] when the wood is carried to the altar pile which is an act that is no part of the Temple service. Raba discoursed: If a courtyard floor was damaged by rainwater one may bring straw and level it. Said R. Papa to Raba: Was It not taught. When he levels the ground he must not scatter the straw either with a small basket or with a large one but only with the bottom broken from a basket? Raba thereupon appointed an amora and delivered the following discourse: The statement I made to you was an error on my part. But it was this indeed that was reported in the name of R. Eliezer: ‘And When he levels it he must not scatter the straw either with a small basket or with a large one but with the bottom broken from a basket.’ WATER ALSO MAY BE DRAWN . . . FROM THE CISTERN OF THE EXILES. Ulla once happened to visit R. Manasseh when a man came and knocked on the door. ‘Who’, he exclaimed ‘is this person? May his body be desecrated, for he desecrates the Sabbath’. ‘Only a musical sound’, said Rabbah to him, ‘has been forbidden’. Abaye pointed out an objection against him: ‘Liquids may be drawn by means of a siphon, and water may be allowed to drip from the arak, for a sick person on the Sabbath’. Thus only ‘for a sick person’ is this allowed, but not for a healthy one. Now, how are we to imagine the circumstances? Would you not agree that this is a case where the sick man was asleep and it was desired that he should wake up? May it not then be inferred that the Production of any sound is forbidden? — No; this is a case where he was awake and it is desired that he should fall asleep, so that the sound heard is one like a tingling noise. He pointed out to him a further objection: If a man guards his fruit against the birds or his gourds against wild beasts he may proceed on the Sabbath in his usual way, provided he does not clap his hand, beat his chest or stamp his feet as is usually done on weekdays. Now what could be the reason? Is it not that the man produces sound and that the production of any sound is forbidden? — R. Aha b. Jacob replied: This is a preventive measure against the Possibility of his Picking up a pebble. What, however, is the reason for the statement which Rab Judah citing Rab made that women who play with nuts commit a transgression? Is it not that this produces sound and that the production of any sound is forbidden? — No; the reason is that they might proceed to level the ground. For, were you not to concede this, how would you explain the ruling of Rab Judah that women who play with apples commit a transgression? What sound could be produced there? Consequently it must be conceded that the reason is that they might proceed to level the ground. We learned: WATER MAY BE DRAWN ON THE SABBATH BY MEANS OF A WHEEL FROM THE CISTERN OF THE EXILES AND FROM THE GREAT CISTERN. Thus only in the Temple is this permitted but not in the country. But what could be the reason? Is it not that the revolution of the wheel produces a sound which is forbidden? — No; this is a preventive measure against the possibility of a man's drawing the water for his garden or his ruin. Amemar allowed the drawing of water by means of a wheel at Mahuza; ‘for’, he said, ‘on what ground did the Rabbis enact a preventive measure against such drawing? Only on the ground that a person might also draw water for his garden or his ruin. But in this place there is neither garden nor ruin’. When, however, he observed that they began toʰʲˡʳˢʷˣʸᵃᵃᵃᵇᵃᶜᵃᵈᵃᵉᵃᶠᵃᵍᵃʰᵃⁱᵃʲᵃᵏᵃˡᵃᵐᵃⁿᵃᵒᵃᵖᵃᵠᵃʳᵃˢᵃᵗᵃᵘᵃᵛᵃʷᵃˣᵃʸᵃᶻᵇᵃᵇᵇᵇᶜᵇᵈᵇᵉᵇᶠᵇᵍᵇʰᵇⁱᵇʲᵇᵏᵇˡᵇᵐᵇⁿᵇᵒᵇᵖᵇᵠ