THE OWNER IS LIABLE FOR THE [PRIEST'S] GIFTS, WHEREAS R. JOSE EXEMPTS HIM. IF ONE OF THEM DIED, R. TARFON SAYS: THEY DIVIDE [THE LIVING ONE]. R. AKIBA SAYS: THE CLAIMANT MUST PRODUCE THE EVIDENCE. IF IT GAVE BIRTH TO A MALE AND A FEMALE, THE PRIEST RECEIVES NOTHING [IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES]. GEMARA. The School of Jannai said: Of R. Jose the Galilean we have heard that he said: It is possible to ascertain [simultaneity] in natural processes, and, therefore, how much more so is it possible to ascertain exactly in human actions. The Rabbis [we know] hold that it is impossible to ascertain simultaneity in natural processes. What is their view with reference to human actions? — Come and hear: A red line went round the altar in order to divide between the blood to be sprinkled above and the blood to be sprinkled below. Now if you say that it is impossible to be exact in human actions, sometimes the priest might put the blood which should be above, below the [middle of] the altar? — The line is made somewhat wide. Come and hear. [Proof can be adduced] from the measurements of the furniture [of the Sanctuary] and from the measurements of the altar! — It is different there, since the Divine Law said: Do it, and in whatever manner you are able to do it, it will be satisfactory, as David said: All this the Lord made me understand in writing by His hand upon me. Said R. Kattina: Come and hear: [If an unclean oven] is divided into two and the parts are equal, both are unclean, for it is impossible to be exact! — R. Kahana replied: An earthen vessel is different because it has holes. Come and hear: If [a slain body is] found at exactly the same distance between two cities, both bring two heifers. These are the words of R. Eliezer. What is the reason? Is it not because he holds that it is possible to be exact in human actions and the words [the city] which is nearest imply [even the cities] which are nearest? — No. R. Eliezerᵃᵇᶜᵈᵉᶠᵍʰⁱʲᵏˡᵐⁿ