Menachot — Daf 73a

תלמוד לומר (ויקרא ז, ט) וכל המנחה אשר תאפה בתנור לכל בני אהרן תהיה איש כאחיו

יכול לא חלקו מנחות כנגד זבחים שלא קמו תחתיהן בדלות אבל יחלקו מנחות כנגד עופות שהרי קמו תחתיהן בדלות תלמוד לומר (ויקרא ז, ט) וכל נעשה במרחשת לכל בני אהרן תהיה

יכול לא יחלקו מנחות כנגד עופות שהללו מיני דמים והללו מיני קמחים יחלקו עופות כנגד זבחים שהללו והללו מיני דמים תלמוד לומר (ויקרא ז, ט) ועל מחבת לכל בני אהרן תהיה

יכול לא יחלקו עופות כנגד זבחים שהללו עשייתן ביד והללו עשייתן בכלי אבל יחלקו מנחות כנגד מנחות שאלו ואלו עשייתן ביד תלמוד לאמר (ויקרא ז, י) וכל מנחה בלולה בשמן לכל בני אהרן תהיה

יכול לא יחלקו מחבת כנגד מרחשת ומרחשת כנגד מחבת שזו מעשיה קשין וזו מעשיה רכין אבל יחלקו מחבת כנגד מחבת ומרחשת כנגד מרחשת תלמוד לומר (ויקרא ז, י) וחרבה לכל בני אהרן תהיה

יכול לא יחלקו בקדשי קדשים אבל יחלקו בקדשים קלים תלמוד לומר (ויקרא ז, י) איש כאחיו ואם על תודה כשם שאין חולקין בקדשי קדשים כך אין חולקים בקדשים קלים

איש איש חולק ואפילו בעל מום ואין קטן חולק ואפילו תם

ההוא מכל נפקא והא אפיקתיה לכדרבי יוסי ברבי יהודה אלא ההוא מוכל

רבינא אמר אתיא מדתני לוי דתני לוי (במדבר יח, ט) לכל קרבנם ולכל מנחתם ולכל חטאתם ולכל אשמם

כל קרבנם לרבות לוג שמן של מצורע סלקא דעתך אמינא (במדבר יח, ט) מן האש כתב רחמנא קמ"ל

לכל מנחתם לרבות מנחת העומר ומנחת קנאות סלקא דעתך אמינא (שמות כט, לג) ואכלו אותם אשר כופר בהם אמר רחמנא והאי להתיר קא אתיא ואידך נמי לברר קא אתיא קמ"ל

(במדבר יח, ט) לכל חטאתם לרבות חטאת העוף סלקא דעתך אמינא נבילה היא קמ"ל

(במדבר יח, ט) לכל אשמם לרבות אשם נזיר ואשם מצורע אשם מצורע בהדיא כתיב ביה (ויקרא יד, יג) כי כחטאת האשם הוא לכהן

אלא לרבות אשם נזיר כאשם מצורע סלקא דעתך אמינא להכשיר קא אתי קמ"ל

(במדבר יח, ט) אשר ישיבו זה גזל הגר (במדבר יח, ט) לך היא ולבניך שלך היא ולבניך אפילו לקדש בו את האשה

אמר רב הונא

Because the text states, And every meal-offering that is baked in the oven...shall all the sons of Aaron have.1 I might think that meal-offerings may not be set off against animal-offerings seeing that in a case of poverty they do not replace them,2 but meal-offerings [I would say] may be set off against bird-offerings since in a case of poverty they do replace them;2 therefore the text states, And all that is prepared in the pan — shall all the sons of Aaron have.3 I might think that meal-offerings may not be set off against bird-offerings seeing that the latter are of the class of blood-offerings and the former of the class of cereal-offerings, but bird-offerings [I would say] may be set off against animal-offerings since both are of the class of blood-offerings; therefore the text states, And on the griddle...shall all the sons of Aaron have.4 I might think that bird-offerings may not be set off against animal-offerings seeing that the preparation of the former is by hand whereas that of the latter is with a utensil,5 but one kind of meal-offering [I would say] may be set off against another kind of meal-offering since the preparation of both is by hand; therefore the text states, And every meal-offering mingled with oil... shall all the sons of Aaron have.6 I might think that the meal-offering prepared on a griddle may not be set off against that prepared in a pan nor that prepared in a pan against that prepared on a griddle, for what is cooked in the one7 is soft and what is cooked in the other8 is hard,9 but one that is prepared on a griddle [I would say] may be set off against another that is also prepared on a griddle, and so, too, one that is prepared in a pan may be set off against another that is also prepared in a pan; therefore the text states, Or dry, shall all the sons of Aaron have.10 I might think that sacrifices which are most holy11 may not be set off against each other, but those which are less holy12 may; therefore the text states, [Shall all the sons of Aaron have,] a man as well as his brother,10 and [in proximity thereto], If he offers it for a thanksgiving:13 just as most holy sacrifices may not be set off against each other, so also less holy sacrifices may not be set off against each other. ‘A man’ [signifies that] a man takes a share even though he has a physical blemish, but not a minor even though he is without blemish!14 -This teaching is derived from, the expression ‘every’.15 But has not this expression been used for the teaching of R. Jose son of R. Judah?16 -That [teaching of R. Jose son of R. Judah] is derived from the expression, ‘and every’.17 Rabina said, It18 can be inferred from Levi's teaching, for Levi taught: [It is written,] Every offering of theirs, even every meal-offering of theirs, and every sin-offering of theirs, and every guilt-offering of theirs.19 ‘Every offering of theirs’ includes the log of oil of the leper.20 For I might have thought that [it shall not be the priest's since] the Divine Law expressly stated, reserved from the fire;21 hence we are informed [that it is not so]. ‘Every meal-offering of theirs’ includes the meal-offering of the ‘Omer and the meal-offering of jealousy. For I might have thought that [these shall not be the priest's since] the Divine Law expressly stated, And they shall eat those things wherewith atonement was made,22 whereas the one serves to render permitted23 and the other to ascertain [the truth];24 hence we are informed [that it is not so]. ‘Every sin-offering of theirs’ includes the sin-offering of a bird. For I might have thought that [it shall not be the priest's since] it is nebelah;25 hence we are informed [that it is not so]. ‘Every guilt-offering of theirs’ includes the guilt-offering of the Nazirite and the guilt-offering of the leper. But with regard to the guilt-offering of the leper, is it not expressly stated, For as the sin-offering is the priest's so is the guilt-offering?26 — Rather it includes the guilt-offering of the Nazirite, that it be like the guilt-offering of the leper. For I might have thought that [it shall not be the priest's since] it but serves to render permitted;27 hence we are informed [that it is not so]. ‘which they may render unto Me’,28 this is the [restitution for the] robbery committed on a proselyte.29 [‘Shall be most holy] for thee and for thy sons’,30 this teaches that it31 is thine own and thy son's own, even to betroth a woman therewith.32 R. Huna said, only in extreme poverty, whereas the meal-offering replaces the bird-offering in ordinary poverty. under no circumstances may one's portion in one offering be set off against another's portion in another offering. Hezekiah from ‘meal-offering’. priests. priest's. interrupted by involuntary defilement. And as it is not an atoning offering it might be said that it may not be eaten by priests. 52b.