Parallel
כתובות 11
Soncino English Talmud · Berean Standard Bible
We will also say: ailonith [the barren woman that is] a man-like woman, who does not bear children. MISHNAH. A WOMAN PROSELYTE, A WOMAN CAPTIVE, AND A WOMAN SLAVE, WHO HAVE BEEN REDEEMED, CONVERTED, OR FREED [WHEN THEY WERE] LESS THAN THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY OLD — THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]. AND THERE IS WITH REGARD TO THEM THE CLAIM OF [NON-]VIRGINITY. R. Joseph said: When they have become of age they can protest [against their conversion]. Abaye asked: A WOMAN PROSELYTE, A WOMAN CAPTIVE, AND A WOMAN SLAVE, WHO HAVE BEEN REDEEMED, CONVERTED OR FREED [WHEN THEY WERE] LESS THAN THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY OLD — THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]. Now if you indeed mean to say [that] when they have become of age they can protest [against their conversion], would we give her the kethubah that she may go and eat [it] in her heathen state? — When she has become of age. [But] when she has become of age, too, she can protest and go out! — As soon as she was of age one hour, and did not protest, she cannot protest any more. Raba raised an objection: These maidens receive the fine: if a man has intercourse with a bastard, a Nethinah, a Cuthean, a proselyte, a captive. or a slave, who have been redeemed, converted, or freed [when they were] less than three years and one day old-they have to be paid the fine. Now if you say [that] when they have become of age they can protest, would we give her the fine that she may go and eat it in her heathen state? — When she has become of age. When she has become of age too she can protest and go out! — As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more. Abaye did not say as Raba [said] [because] there [where it speaks of fines MISHNAH. WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN47 HAS HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A LITTLE GIRL, OR WHEN A SMALL BOY50 HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, OR [WHEN A GIRL WAS ACCIDENTALLY] INJURED BY A PIECE OF WOOD51 — [IN ALL THESE CASES] THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]; SO ACCORDING TO R. MEIR. BUT THE SAGES SAY: A GIRL WHO WAS INJURED ACCIDENTALLY BY A PIECE OF WOOD — HER KETHUBAH IS A MANEH. A VIRGIN, WHO WAS A WIDOW, A DIVORCEE, OR A HALUZAH FROM MARRIAGE — HER KETHUBAH IS A MANEH.
—
AND THERE IS WITH REGARD TO THEM NO CHARGE OF NONVIRGINITY. A WOMAN PROSELYTE, A WOMAN CAPTIVE AND A WOMAN SLAVE, WHO HAVE BEEN REDEEMED, CONVERTED, OR FREED [WHEN THEY WERE] MORE THAN THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY OLD — THEIR KETHUBAH IS A MANEH, AND THERE IS WITH REGARD TO THEM NO CHARGE OF NON-VIRGINITY. GEMARA. Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who Rami b. Hama said: The difference of opinion is [only] when he knew her, for R. Meir compares her to a mature girl, and 'But if he did not know her, all agree that she gets nothing'.22 R. Nahman objected: If she says. 'I was injured by a piece of wood,' and he says. 'No, but thou hadst intercourse with a man', Rabban Gamaliel and R. Eliezer say [that] she is believed!23 But, said Raba, whether he knew her24 and whether he did not know her, according to R. Meir [her kethubah is] two hundred [zuz];26 [whereas] according to the Rabbis, if he knew her [her kethubah is] a maneh, [if] he did not know her, she gets nothing. Raba however changed his opinion, for it has been taught: How [does] the bringing out of an evil name [take place]? He comes to court and says, 'I, So-and-so, have not found in thy daughter the tokens of virginity.' If there are witnesses that she has been unchaste under him, she gets a kethubah of a maneh. [But surely] if there are witnesses that she has been unchaste under him, she is to be stoned! — It means this: If there are witnesses that she has been unchaste under him, she has to be stoned; if she was unchaste before [the betrothal], she gets a kethubah of a maneh. Now R. Hiyya b. Abin said [that] R. Shesheth said: This teaches: If he married her in the presumption that she is a virgin and she was found to have had intercourse with a man, she gets a kethubah of a maneh. Whereupon R. Nahman objected: 'If one marries a woman and does not find in her virginity, [and] she says, "After thou hadst betrothed me [to thyself] I was forced and [thus] thy field has been inundated," and he says, "No, but before I betrothed thee [unto me] [thou hadst intercourse with a man], my bargain is [thus] a mistaken one." [etc.]' and [this assuredly means] she is to get nothing! And R. Hiyya b. Abin said to them: Is it possible! R. Amram and all the great ones of the age sat when R. Shesheth said that teaching and they found it difficult and he answered: In which respect is it indeed a mistaken bargain? In respect of two hundred [zuz:], but a maneh she gets [as a kethubah]. And you say [that it means] she gets nothing! Whereupon Raba said: He who asked [this question] has asked well, for a mistaken bargain' means entirely. But [then] that [other teaching] presents a difficulty. Put [it] right and say thus: If there are witnesses that she was unchaste under him she has to be stoned, if she was unchaste before [the betrothal], she gets nothing, if she was found to be injured by a piece of wood, she has a kethubah of a maneh. But Surely it was Raba who said [above that], according to the Rabbis, if he did not know her, she gets nothing! Hence you must conclude from this that Raba retracted from that [opinion]. Our Rabbis taught: If the first [husband] took her [the bride] to his home for the purpose of marriage. and she has witnesses that she was not alone [with him,] or even if she was alone [with him]. but she did not stay [with him] as much time as is needed for intercourse, the second [husband] cannot raise any complaint with regard to her virginity, for the first [husband] had taken her to his home [for the purpose of marriage].
—